Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Romantic Child and Blake...


This week’s section is entitled The Romantic Child, and what better subject to talk about than William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and Experience. I just have some random thoughts and connections that I think I picked up on that I’m going to ramble about. First off, I am not very educated in examining or interpreting art but I will take a stab at it while looking at the frontpieces and title pages of this book and how they relate to some selected poems from the work. The frontpeice (http://www.blakearchive.org/blake/images/songsie.b.p2.300.jpg) shows a child angel flying above a man. The man is looking up at the angel and holding a recorder or some similar instrument. They are in a natural setting and the man seems to be leading a flock of sheep.  The first connection that jumps to my head is the angel and the lamb from the poem “The Lamb”. (http://www.blakearchive.org/exist/blake/archive/transcription.xq?objectid=songsie.b.illbk.16). This little poem is about a child being asked and then told where he or she came from. The child is called a lamb in the poem just as Jesus himself is referred to as the Lamb of God in the Bible. Blake is making the case that children are heavenly gifts as Jesus was sent down from heaven in the human form. I see a similarity in how he represents the child in the frontpiece as an angel and the child as a lamb. Both are symbols of innocent and heavenly creations. Throughout the Songs of Innocence Blake keeps the children pure, innocent and angle like. Even in The Chimney Sweeper he has the child dream of an angel taking the dead children to heaven where the sweeper knows the children will be better off.
            Another thought that came to me was I saw a connection between Locke and Rousseau’s ideas that it is important to play and experience nature. The poems “The School Boy”(http://www.blakearchive.org/exist/blake/archive/transcription.xq?objectid=songsie.b.illbk.20&java=yes) and “Nurses Song” (http://www.blakearchive.org/exist/blake/archive/transcription.xq?objectid=songsie.b.illbk.13&java=yes) both are about children and how they feel about being in nature rather than inside somewhere.  In both of these poems Blake puts importance on the children being in nature and not stuck in some dreary classroom or house. “The School Boy” reminds me of my own yearning to be outdoors on a beautiful day. I found it hard to pay attention to any book or school direction when I knew that there were experiences to be had outside. “Nurses Song” reminds me of those innocent summer nights of playing in the neighborhood. When thinking about it now not only was I playing but learning different aspects of life such as nature while catching bugs or just socialization by getting along with other children while learning and playing games. To Locke these would be just as or more important than anything learned in a book or a boring old school house.  

Sunday, September 23, 2012

John Locke


John Locke, a rational guy. A visionary. A mind before his time. I rather liked the little synopsis in the Demers reading about the rational moralists Locke and Rousseau.  When I think about it it’s quite amazing that it was in 1692 when Locke’s   Some Thoughts Concerning Education was published. His idea that children are rational beings rather than little adults was revolutionary for his time. I believe in some of his methods for teaching children are effective. But considering Locke’s place in society his it is apparent that his method would not be available for all children. First of all you would have to have money. At least have enough money to pay for a tutor or personal instructor. And it seems like he was definitely addressing the education of boys. So if you were lucky enough to be a boy born into a family with enough money to afford a teacher that was willing to instruct you according to Locke’s thoughts concerning education I would say that you would be a lucky young lad for the time.
So I imagine myself being one of these boys lucky enough to get this type of education. Thank god I don’t have to sit through Greek and Latin before I have even mastered English. I have to learn my manners first. Root out my bad habits and learn good virtues. My tutor keeps reiterating the importance of my character. Character before knowledge.  But once I have what is deemed a strong character I can concentrate on the bookish side of education. Sometimes I don’t like it but I am told that I may be a fine scholar one day that can pass on my knowledge to my brothers. My instructor and I play lots of games with blocks and balls with letters on them. Sometimes I can’t believe that my dad pays this guy money to play games with me…
Well I think an education like that would have been much better than the typical rote learning that was popular back then. His ideas were just the beginning of changing the way we educate children. His advocacy of play as an important part of a children’s learning process is still ignored all too often today.
Ps. I know this is slightly off topic and last weeks news but I found it interesting.